Urban Elephants
drawingmethod excel2003 hackerabc


Home The Trunk MyBlog "Bipartisan"-style Thought: Designed to Fail

"Bipartisan"-style Thought: Designed to Fail

E-mail Print PDF

jay golub

This may be an odd thread, but with the healthcare "summit," the driving Northeast snow and the mindless push towards "bipartisanship" on the most recent jobs bill, I was reminded of this thought from "The Road to Serfdom"...

If a numerous group is needed, strong enough to impose their views on the values of life on all the rest, it will never be those with highly differentiated and developed tastes – it will be those who form the “mass” in the derogatory sense of the term, the least original and independent, who will be able to put the weight of their numbers behind their particular ideals.

[A political dictator] will be able to obtain the support of all the docile and gullible, who have no strong convictions of their own but are prepared to accept a ready-made system of values if it is only drummed in to their ears sufficiently loudly and frequently.  It will be those whose vague and imperfectly formed ideas are easily swayed and whose passions and emotions are readily aroused who will thus swell the ranks of the totalitarian party.

It is in connection with the deliberate effort of the skilful demagogue to weld together a closely coherent and homogeneous body of supporters that the third and perhaps most important negative element of selection enters.  It seems to be almost a law of human nature that it is easier for people to agree on a negative program – on the hatred of an enemy, on the envy of those better off – than on any positive task.

...which sums up my views on the political time we live in and I would add...

Healthcare reform should be dead - the people have spoken.  Yet, Obama holds a "summit" where both sides are bickering pathetically and are completely opposed to one another philosophically.  If there is anything "done" on this issue this year, radical compromise would be a prerequisite - something that will produce a "low standard" result based on the views of the "lowest common denominator" in our society.

We had a "Climate Conference" and the constant call for "action" to save the environment, yet I'm shoveling more snow this year than I can ever remember.  I know that's not scientific, but just like with these global warming alarmists, if I drum it in people's ears "loudly and frequently" enough, you never know.

We passed a "jobs bill" recently that will cost billions and billions of dollars to American taxpayers.  Besides the fact that it is commonly accepted that government can't "create" jobs, the method we use to pay for these pointless programs necessitates building up hatred for an enemy.  In this day and age, it is of the "banker" or, better stated, the evil "investment banker."  To truly stimulate the economy, the "positive task" needed from government would be to shrink itself as much as possible and get out of the way - leaving more resources for the private sector to invest in jobs.  Yet, that would make the "enemy" government itself and I see few with the moral and ethical courage in D.C. to be takers for that message.

Hayek closed with this one...

Once you admit that the individual is merely a means to serve the ends of the higher entity called society or the nation, most of those features of totalitarian regimes which horrify us follow of necessity.

...or said in another way by another famous "skilful demagogue," President Kennedy,...

And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country.

...which was followed by this chilling statement...

My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.

...by definition, anything that is done by "the citizens of the world" will NOT be towards the "freedom of man," but more accurately, to the direct opposite...

 

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Sunday, 28 February 2010 23:08 )  

Our valuable member Jay Golub has been with us since Monday, 07 April 2008.

Show Other Articles Of This Author

UE Login

We have 417 guests online

UE Online

None

UE Contributors

Alicia Colon

Jay Golub

Robert Hornak

Herb London

Roger Madon

Dick Morris

Deroy Murdock

Star Parker


Paladin

ue
The Editors


Polls

Do you think the Tea Party movement will be a benefit or a liability to Republican candidates in the 2010 election?
 

Latest Comments

NY Dems Interject in...
Wow, more hysteria and now name calling. GOPNYC, y...
Discussionary Topics...
There's one more topic for discussion I left off i...
NY Dems Interject in...
...so far as I know, there's no cure for just plai...
NY Dems Interject in...
I think you need to refill the prozac prescription...
NY Dems Interject in...
The GOP tries to maintain a "Big Tent", but with b...
NY Dems Interject in...
You are aware you’re attacking Altschuler, right...
Conservative Society...
All of those bashing Altschuler are just trying to...
Barack Obama's Faceb...
Some of the best stuff I've been reading are comme...
Barack Obama's Faceb...
I thought it was funny. Time for more political h...
Barack Obama's Faceb...
This is stupid.
NY Dems Interject in...
You call Altschuler a liar, yet you use lies to di...
Problems Grow for Ra...
Randy Altschuler is a deeply flawed candidate. Sad...
NY Dems Interject in...
Altschuler is absolutely flawed..big time and ever...
NY Dems Interject in...
There's no confusion on my part. The dems have stu...
NY Dems Interject in...
This post is bizarre on several levels, not the le...

For more of our original content, please visit The Trunk for articles from our offical writers or The Herd for posts in our open blogger section.