This Opinion Just In…
TEMECULA, California — As top Democrats address their national convention in Denver, they will propose “ending” Operation Iraqi Freedom, demand a speedy withdrawal of U.S. forces there, and insist that “Bush lied, and people died.” What they will not do is apologize for their nearly universal failure in judgment regarding the wisdom and effectiveness of President Bush’s spring 2007 “surge” of 20,000 troops into Iraq. Widespread Democratic defeatism and lack of faith in our GIs’ ability to win gouged a gap between their forecasts of doom yesterday and Iraq’s far sunnier outlook today. With few exceptions, Democrats got this one dead wrong.
• “I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is [sic] going to solve the sectarian violence there,” Senator Barack Obama (D – Illinois) said on January 10, 2007. “In fact, I think it will do the reverse.”
Not so.
Thanks to brave U.S. GIs and valiant Iraqi soldiers, cops, and volunteers, Iraq is increasingly tranquil. According to the September-October issue of Foreign Affairs, “Overall violence is down at least 80 percent since the surge began, and ethno-sectarian violence — the kind that seemed to be sucking Iraq into all-out civil war in 2006 — is down by over 90 percent.” American fatalities have plummeted from 66 in July 2007 to five last month.
“By and large, what’s left of the insurgency is just trying to hang on,” U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker told the Associated Press July 24.
“As we have surged into neighborhoods — to protect the Iraqi people, earning their trust, and benefiting from their help — violence has dropped, and locals have turned against the jihadists,” Army National Guard Captain Pete Hegseth, chairman of Vets for Freedom wrote August 15 after returning to Samarra, where he served from December 2005 – July 2006.
“The economy on the street is booming,” a Baghdad-based American businessman told me. “The Iraqi people are going about their business, and business is thriving. It is so, more and more. I see it in places I could not go even six months ago.”
• “The simple fact is that sending in over 20,000 additional troops isn’t the answer. In fact, it’s a tragic mistake,” 2004 Democratic nominee John Kerry said on February 16, 2007. The Massachusetts senator continued: “It won’t end the violence; it won’t provide security…. It won’t turn back the clock and avoid the civil war that is already underway; it won’t deter terrorists, who have a completely different agenda; it won’t rein in the militias.”
The simple fact is that the surge has helped turn the Mahdi Army, Iraq’s biggest militia, into a charity. “The group will focus on education, religion, and social justice,” the Wall Street Journal’s Gina Chon explained August 5. Radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr decided to disarm his battered force. He is rumored to be studying Islam in Iran.
As for terrorists, the surge and Sunni disgust with al-Qaeda in Iraq’s Islamo-fascism almost have squeezed AQI to death. Last month alone, two high-value AQI-affiliated emirs and an associate surrendered to Iraqi and Coalition forces.
• “The surge is not succeeding,” Senator Joseph Biden (D – Delaware) told journalists on April 26, 2007. “It’s like squeezing a water balloon. You squeeze it in one place, it bulges somewhere else.”
While Biden proposed trisecting Iraq into a Shiite south, Sunni middle, and Kurdish north, the surge has calmed things enough that Iraqis are working to keep their constitutional republic together, rather than yield to centrifugal forces.
• “The surge was designed to give the Iraqi government time to take steps to ensure a political solution,” Senator Hillary Clinton said August 22, 2007. “It has failed.”
Congressional Democrats like Clinton often attack Iraq’s parliament as foot draggers who specifically failed to implement a petroleum reform law. This is mighty rich for Democrats who managed not to pass even one appropriations bill this year, yet jetted off for a five-week vacation rather than consider GOP ideas for increasing oil and energy production.
The Iraqi parliament in 2008 adopted a budget, a pension law, and amnesty for some prisoners. It scheduled provincial elections for October and is weighing plans for an expected $50 billion budget surplus (a virtual foreign phrase in Washington, D.C.), largely from an ever more productive petroleum sector.
According to the Brookings Institution’s stunningly comprehensive Iraq Index, attacks on Iraqi oil pipelines fell from 19 in May 2007 to one last March. This has helped oil production swell to 2.54 million barrels per day, surpassing peak pre-war production of 2.5 million barrels daily.
• On April 19, 2007, Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada flatly declared that ‘‘this war is lost and the surge is not accomplishing anything…”
“The United States is now winning the war that two years ago seemed lost,” the AP’s Robert Burns and Robert Reid reported last July 26. “In Baghdad, parks are filled every weekend with families playing and picnicking with their children. That was unthinkable only a year ago…”
While key Democrats blew it, starting with their standard bearer, the GOP nominee got it right.
“We must have more troops over there,” Senator John McCain told Fox News Channel on December 12, 2006. “And we have to have a big enough surge that we can get Baghdad under control and then Anbar province under control.”
McCain embraced the surge concept, encouraged President Bush to implement it, and energized Republicans on Capitol Hill and across America to support it. He trusted U.S. service personnel to stabilize Iraq. And they delivered — big time.
On the Nation’s most urgent issue, John McCain and the GOP scored a bull’s eye, while Barack Obama and the Democrats’ arrow missed the target and crashed in the dust.
New York commentator Deroy Murdock is a columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University.
TrackBack URI for this entry
Subscribe to this comment's feed
written by Andrew Roman , August 25, 2008
There are so many examples of Democrats being dead wrong on so many of the critical issues of our time that there isn't enough bandwidth in the entirety of the internet to chronicle them. It's interesting to me - and somewhat frightening - how Democrats fail to grasp the concept of recorded sound, captured video or the ability to recall almost instantaneously actions and words from the past. It seems that every prediction regarding the War in Iraq made by these cartoon soothsayers has been absolutely wrong. From believing like everyone else in the existence of "Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq" to declaring the war a "lost cause," the ever-nuanced Left doesn't seem to get that things you say and do WILL come back to haunt you.
The problem is, the Left is haunted by nothing. To be a leftist is to never have to apologize. As long as the intention is there, and it feels good, it's all fine.
Even in the face of indisputable evidence that the United States of America is, in fact, winning - and decisively, I might add - in Iraq, Democrats refuse to lift their noses out of their antiquated playbooks to see the economy in Iraq thriving, to see the violence dissipating almost exponentially, to understand that evil is being thwarted there by the Good Guys. There are truly parallel universes out there - one for Democrats and one for the sane.
I know it sounds too simple to be a profundity, but it is often difficult to differentiate between a Democrat emoting and a Democrat stating a policy position. That's because in this county today there is one party who is serious and one who is not.
Andrew Roman
Brooklyn, NY
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
